Ford Motor Company and SK On have agreed to dissolve their BlueOval SK joint venture, effectively splitting the assets of their $11.4 billion partnership. The strategic decision, announced on December 11, 2025, allows both companies to decouple their manufacturing operations in Kentucky and Tennessee. This move comes in response to cooling EV demand and a need for greater operational agility.
Highlights
- Asset Division: Ford assumes full ownership of the Kentucky battery plants; SK On takes control of the Tennessee facility.
- Communication Imbalance: SK On released a detailed strategic roadmap, while Ford issued a single-sentence acknowledgment.
- Strategic Pivot: SK On will diversify the Tennessee plant to produce Energy Storage Systems (ESS) and supply multiple OEMs.
- Loan Restructuring: The $9.2 billion Department of Energy loan will be restructured to reflect the separated entities.
Strategic Restructuring and Asset Division
The termination of the BlueOval SK partnership dismantles the vertically integrated supply chain model originally envisioned in 2021. Both companies will now independently manage the facilities previously under the joint venture umbrella.
Kentucky and Tennessee Ownership
Under the new agreement, Ford acquires sole ownership of the BlueOval SK Battery Park in Glendale, Kentucky. This site includes:
- Kentucky Plant 1: Operational since August 2025, currently producing cells for the F-150 Lightning.
- Kentucky Plant 2: Currently stalled, with construction paused due to market conditions.
SK On assumes full control of the battery plant at BlueOval City in Stanton, Tennessee. Although located on Ford’s mega-campus, this facility will operate as an independent supplier. SK On plans to utilize this capacity to fulfill existing Ford contracts while simultaneously pursuing agreements with other automakers.
Official Statements and Communication Strategy
The dissolution was marked by a distinct contrast in communication strategies. SK On provided a comprehensive disclosure regarding the split, whereas Ford maintained a reactive and minimal public profile.
SK On Drives the Narrative
SK On effectively controlled the news cycle by releasing a detailed press statement outlining the rationale for the split. The South Korean battery maker framed the decision as a “strategic realignment” designed to enhance operational efficiency. SK On emphasized its plan to pivot the Tennessee facility toward the Energy Storage Systems (ESS) market, a move intended to stabilize utilization rates by serving grid-storage clients alongside automotive OEMs.
Ford’s “No Comment” Strategy
In sharp contrast, Ford issued a terse statement following SK On’s announcement. The automaker provided only a single sentence to media outlets:
“We are aware of SK’s disclosure and we have nothing further to share at this time.”
A supplementary statement from BlueOval SK’s External Affairs Director, Keli McAlister, mirrored this ambiguity: “BlueOval SK is aware of SK On’s disclosure and announcement. We are working with both of our parent companies to determine what this means for BlueOval SK.”
Market Context and Financial Implications
The breakup reflects broader headwinds in the US electric vehicle sector, including slower-than-expected adoption rates and shifting federal incentives.
DOE Loan and Capital Efficiency
The separation necessitates a restructuring of the $9.2 billion loan conditionally awarded by the US Department of Energy.
- Loan Status: The financing package will be divided and resized to align with the new ownership structures.
- Capital Discipline: Ford is prioritizing cost control and rapid repayment of drawn funds to minimize exposure.
- Operational Flexibility: Ford gains the ability to modulate battery production in Kentucky without partner consensus, while SK On frees itself from exclusive reliance on Ford’s fluctuating volume requirements.
Stock It To Me
Sign up for our popular daily email to catch all the latest EV news!
